On Jul 4, 8:12 am, artful <artful...@hotmail.com> wrote: > harald says... > > >On Jul 3, 4:10=A0pm, stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) wrote: > >> I'm not sure what paradox you are referring to, then. > >I did some digging to understand the main cause of confusion. What I > >found, is the clock paradox started out as the one that Einstein was > >confronted with, as criticism of his GRT. At least, concerning SRT, > >before the development of GRT, I found no trace of such a paradox in > >the old literature. Did you? > > 1905 paper has the first exposition of the twins paradox (though not > in the currently frames words) .. of a pair of clocks at rest, then > one moves away and returns and shows a shorter elapsed time
That's not caused by time dilation...but rather a traveling clock second contain a larger amount of absolute time than a stay at home clock second.
> > No GR involved there. > > Or are you talking now of some other paradox?