|
|
Re: RMP # 48
Posted:
Jul 11, 2010 1:16 AM
|
|
"Ahmes and the MMP scribe explicitly used 256/81 for their value for pi."
If they "explicitly" used 256/81 for their value for pi, it would be written as 3 + 1/9 + 1/27 + 1/81. Where does this appear anywhere in the RMP or the MMP?
|
|
