On Jul 11, 8:50 pm, Michael Gordge <mikegor...@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jul 11, 4:54 pm, "k...@nventure.com" <k...@nventure.com> wrote: > > > There are many that are smart, and many that are not. > > So are your smart enough to answer -- What is it about time that you > and "mainline science" do not understand?
> > > There are fewer that are very smart and only a very few > > that are exceptionally smart - > > So are you exceptionally smart enough to explain what it is about time > that you and "mainline science" do not understand?
> > > Then there are those that are so dumb that they > > think they are smart - > > So do you think you are smart enough to explain what it about time > that you claim "mainline science" doesn't understand?
Never stated, claimed, or implied that.
> > MG
Having to explain the clear and simple message contained in the sentences of my original post empirically demonstrates the truth of the last statement that:
There are those that are so dumb that they think they are smart.