On Jul 14, 2:40 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jul 14, 6:24 pm, "k...@nventure.com" <k...@nventure.com> wrote: > > > Having to explain the clear and simple message.............. > > You said: > > "So it can safely be said that mainline science does not > understand time or space. Period!" > > It's a simple question ---- What do you mean by "time" in your > claim ...."that mainline science does not understand time or space. > Period"? > > MG
OMG - you're dumber than dumb.
So I say dumb does not apply in your case, but that IDIOT is more appropriate.
I stated that no one understands time - this includes me. So how can I possibly tell you "what I mean by time"? Furthermore - where did you ever get the stupid idea that there must be 'parts' to time that you mention in your prior posts?
With the exception of the posts by Fred J. McCall, jmfbahciv, and me, all the posts in this thread about time are just BS wild ass guesses, without a bit of logic or any empircal proof that is a requirement of true physics. So if I tried to give you 'what I mean by time', this would be just conjecture, and fall into the same category as all the other BS posts about time on this thread.
However, your posts do positively and empirically prove that:
1. You are an IDIOT. 2. You have absolutely no concept of physics. 3. That Einstein was right when he stated:
There may be 2 things that infinite. The 1st is the universe. The 2nd is the human capacity for stupidity.