On 18 Juli, 12:05, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/18/10 4:58 AM, JT wrote: > > > > > > > On 18 Juli, 11:48, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/18/10 4:33 AM, JT wrote: > > >>> Time is the ***universal nonevariant linear ratio*** we chosen to > >>> measure motion and change, when causual events take place(sets off). > > >> Not so. Time is not independent of space. Read this 1905 paper > > >> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES > >> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ > > > Even if i beleived in time dilation it really would be delayed variant > > time units ala SR, that is not time Sam time is the nonevariant flow > > of change it is not the variant units that you hold so dear. I think i > > have to go Seto and declare PROPER TIME. > > > JT > > You do like to ignore both theory and evidence, don't you JT? > > Physics FAQ: What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity? > http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html- Dölj citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text -
No Sam time is the ***universal rate*** that a pulsar flickers with using a ***nonevariant unit***. Units are nonevariant according to your Dear SR theory clocks around the equatorial band would be slower then clocks at the fixed poles and it simply do not happen.