On Jul 18, 9:10 am, John Stafford <n...@droffats.ten> wrote: > In article > <82f51801-6ce2-41d7-a3a1-f42ad2624...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > Huang <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > [1] Relativity > > > [2] HUP > > > [3] WP-Duality > > > [4] A correct understanding of causality > > > [5] A correct understanding of continuity of spacetime > > > [6] An a-priori understanding of why we have such a thing as Planck > > > Length > > > [7] A correct understanding of order/disorder > > > [8] A better understanding of paradox and it's signifigance in physics > > > Also forgot to mention perhaps the most important > > > [9] Conservation. I can explain conservation in a way that you've > > never heard before because scientists are dum. I can explain > > conservation without resorting to a magic wand. > > > You guys do nonstandard physics like Jackson Pollock paints pictures, > > here's a clue: Jello dont stick to the wall. > > You are sooooo superior. And you will be obsolete without knowing it.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
If you say so pal - those are your words, not mine.
