In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Huang <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 9:10 am, John Stafford <n...@droffats.ten> wrote: > > In article > > <82f51801-6ce2-41d7-a3a1-f42ad2624...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > Huang <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >  Relativity > > > >  HUP > > > >  WP-Duality > > > >  A correct understanding of causality > > > >  A correct understanding of continuity of spacetime > > > >  An a-priori understanding of why we have such a thing as Planck > > > > Length > > > >  A correct understanding of order/disorder > > > >  A better understanding of paradox and it's signifigance in physics > > > > > Also forgot to mention perhaps the most important > > > > >  Conservation. I can explain conservation in a way that you've > > > never heard before because scientists are dum. I can explain > > > conservation without resorting to a magic wand. > > > > > You guys do nonstandard physics like Jackson Pollock paints pictures, > > > here's a clue: Jello dont stick to the wall. > > > > You are sooooo superior. And you will be obsolete without knowing it.- Hide > > quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > If you say so pal - those are your words, not mine.
Consider the trap of pride, a lack of self-criticism and skepticism.