In article <28e13431-8e49-4b89-bef7-d7a5af5edefc@t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>, Huang <huangxienchen@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 9:10 am, John Stafford <n...@droffats.ten> wrote: > > In article > > <82f51801-6ce2-41d7-a3a1-f42ad2624...@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > Huang <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > [1] Relativity > > > > [2] HUP > > > > [3] WP-Duality > > > > [4] A correct understanding of causality > > > > [5] A correct understanding of continuity of spacetime > > > > [6] An a-priori understanding of why we have such a thing as Planck > > > > Length > > > > [7] A correct understanding of order/disorder > > > > [8] A better understanding of paradox and it's signifigance in physics > > > > > Also forgot to mention perhaps the most important > > > > > [9] Conservation. I can explain conservation in a way that you've > > > never heard before because scientists are dum. I can explain > > > conservation without resorting to a magic wand. > > > > > You guys do nonstandard physics like Jackson Pollock paints pictures, > > > here's a clue: Jello dont stick to the wall. > > > > You are sooooo superior. And you will be obsolete without knowing it.- Hide > > quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > If you say so pal - those are your words, not mine.
Consider the trap of pride, a lack of self-criticism and skepticism.
