Huang wrote: > On Jul 18, 5:54 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/18/10 5:22 AM, JT wrote: >> >> > No Sam time is the ***universal rate*** that a pulsar flickers with >> > using a ***nonevariant unit***. Units are nonevariant according to >> > your Dear SR theory clocks around the equatorial band would be slower >> > then clocks at the fixed poles and it simply do not happen. >> >> Not true with satellite clocks such as those used in GPS. > > > Time and length are the same thing. They are just dimensions. Our > perception is that time is somehow different but it is not. They are > the same thing. > > We can model these dimensions as existing with certainty = 1, or we > can model them as if they were existentially indeterminate. These two > approaches are equivalent. Starting with this fundamental view you can > derive many things. >  Relativity >  HUP >  WP-Duality >  A correct understanding of causality >  A correct understanding of continuity of spacetime >  An a-priori understanding of why we have such a thing as Planck > Length >  A correct understanding of order/disorder >  A better understanding of paradox and it's signifigance in physics > > So pick a topic and I'll explain why I'm right, unless you lack the > balls to hold my feet to the fire. > How do you define mass? How do you measure it with a ruler?