Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » amte

Topic: Traditional versus reform
Replies: 34   Last Post: Feb 27, 1999 2:24 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Bob M. Drake

Posts: 85
Registered: 12/8/04
Re: Traditional versus reform
Posted: Feb 18, 1999 10:25 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

gg> P.S. A question I've never had answered: can anyone with firm ties to
the NCTM please venture an opinion whether or not MathLand, from Creative
Publications, conforms to the NCTM Standards.

bd> I believe NCTM policy prohibits endorsing (or bashing) vendors'
materials. Even Saxon (representing the antithesis of quality textbooks) is
permitted to rent booth space at NCTM conferences. Critiques of curriculum
materials are sometimes included in their journals, but I don't know if
MathLand has been reviewed. Even if it were, the reviews are usually more
descriptive rather than subjective. Regardless, I don't think NCTM is in
the business of branding curriculum materials with their stamp of approval
-- that's left to others. It wouldn't be a good idea.




Date Subject Author
2/16/99
Read Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/16/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Daniel Brahier
2/17/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/17/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Greg Goodknight
2/17/99
Read RE: Traditional versus reform
Domenico Rosa
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Paul S. Ache III
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Bob M. Drake
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/19/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Bob M. Drake
2/19/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Paul S. Ache III
2/19/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/20/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Bob M. Drake
2/20/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/20/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Cynthia Garland-Dore
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Greg Goodknight
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Daniel Brahier
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Susan Moore
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Karen Dee Michalowicz
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Daniel Brahier
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Shelley Walsh
2/22/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Bob M. Drake
2/22/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Mark Klespis
2/22/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/23/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
RayM
2/23/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/23/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Guy F. Brandenburg
2/23/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/24/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/24/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/24/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/25/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/27/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Greg Goodknight

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.