Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » amte

Topic: Traditional versus reform
Replies: 34   Last Post: Feb 27, 1999 2:24 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jerry Uhl

Posts: 1,267
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Traditional versus reform
Posted: Feb 18, 1999 5:14 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

At 12:49 PM -0600 2/17/99, Wayne Bishop wrote:
>Dear Jerry,
>
>I suspect we both are quite certain that Morris Kline would have expected
>certain arithmetic competencies or he'd have chosen a different title for the
>book.


There are good reform efforts, there are irrelevant but harmless reform
>efforts, and there are clearly damaging reform efforts.

Wayne-
Sure!
The problem you and I have in communicating is your tendency to lump all
reform efforts together and then attack the worst one as represenative of
all reform. There is bad reform out there and there is good reform too.

-Jerry
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Uhl juhl@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Professor of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Member, Mathematical Sciences Education Board of National Research Council

Calculus&Mathematica, DiffEq&Mathematica, Matrices,Geometry&Mathematica,
NetMath

http://www-cm.math.uiuc.edu and http://netmath.math.uiuc.edu

"Is it life, I ask, is it even prudence,
To bore thyself and bore the students?"

. . . Johann Wolfgang von Goethe




Date Subject Author
2/16/99
Read Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/16/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Daniel Brahier
2/17/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/17/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Greg Goodknight
2/17/99
Read RE: Traditional versus reform
Domenico Rosa
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Paul S. Ache III
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Bob M. Drake
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/18/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/19/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Bob M. Drake
2/19/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Paul S. Ache III
2/19/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/20/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Bob M. Drake
2/20/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/20/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Cynthia Garland-Dore
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Greg Goodknight
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Daniel Brahier
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Susan Moore
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Karen Dee Michalowicz
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Daniel Brahier
2/21/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Shelley Walsh
2/22/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Bob M. Drake
2/22/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Mark Klespis
2/22/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/23/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
RayM
2/23/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/23/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Guy F. Brandenburg
2/23/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/24/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/24/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/24/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Jerry Uhl
2/25/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Wayne Bishop
2/27/99
Read Re: Traditional versus reform
Greg Goodknight

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.