jmfbahciv: > Vladimir Kirov wrote: > > > > jmfbahciv: > >> [spit a newsgroup] > >> > >> Vladimir Kirov wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I consider that space - nonconstant ensemble. > >> > Term a space-time is error since space bound with time and time is > >> > part of space. Nonpossible to visualize the space without time and > >> > time without space. > >> > > >> > With respekt! > >> > > >> Oh, good grief. The term space-time implies a geometry which is > >> not Euclidean. > >> > >> /BAH > > > > If space to separate of time that this will already non space, but > > statistical ensemble, to which possible add time. > > > > > Euclidean geometry adds as in c^2=a^2+b^2 > > The geometry used in space-time subtracts. Lorentz geometry. > Read the first 5 sections of _Space-time Physics_ by > Taylor and Wheeler. > > /BAH
If in Euclidean space there is no time is a set. But time is present, but it not formal in definition, and is shown at operations on set. We take, for example, space of names. In definition space time is absent, but at operations on set it is quite defined in force determinations spaces.
So if we speak the space-time, that imply that beside this space 2 time.
