On 15 Okt, 07:49, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 14, 8:49 pm, Yap <hhyaps...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 14 Okt, 15:04, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 14, 2:41 pm, Christopher A. Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote: > > > > > People who dismiss induction never seem to wonder if the next time > > > > they sit on a chair, it won't support thrm. > > > > I notice that the biggest idiot of alt.agnostic is here to enter his > > > useless piasta. Listen, dog-breath, no one is dismissing scientific > > > argument. But please continue to show your abject ignorance. > > > You should try to be more patient. > > With people like Lee? You have to be kidding! You are not yourself. > > > The point is induction is what we all are based on, not as a > > scientific argument. > > You don't know what your are talking about or if you do, it is not > anything I am talking about You refuse to concede. > > > By that you should also appreciate the reality in this world and no > > fantasy can help you to go by. > > What makes you think you understand the least interesting thing in > this thread? All things are interesting, especially you. It is quite fascinating to study you and dorayme together, if I have the time.