Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: SONNTAG! Symmetries of Nature 'n' Truth about Gravity(& Planck Units).
Replies: 24   Last Post: Mar 26, 2012 6:48 PM

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 h.jones Posts: 32 From: uk Registered: 2/21/08
Re: SONNTAG! Symmetries of Nature 'n' Truth about Gravity(& Planck Units).
Posted: Dec 14, 2010 9:05 AM
 Plain Text Reply

There are any number of mass models that can be run alongside our own
kg system. There is, for example, the protonic system, based, as the
word suggests, on the proton. Using the proton Compton frequency,
(2.268731561x10^23)^1.5= 1.0806x10^35 protonic units of weight given
as timescale mass for one second; and by linking it to the SI metre we
have a useful template quite close to the kg. Also using the Model
Template as a close guide to the kg we have a one second timescale
mass of 1.0095x10^35kg.
The GM product of both systems will be 6.736x10^24 as both are
measured in seconds and metres.
An informative method in quantum gravitational research is to use this
number, 6.736x10^24, as a measure in local units of mass, in our case
kilograms and protonic units and then find the relevant schwarzschild
radii. In this case 1.00019955x10^-2 metres for the kg and
9.34368435x10^-3 metres for the protonic mass.
The quantum gravitational analogue for the protonic radius is
29.6906035 but we cannot be certain about the kg.
However, 8pi[(9.343684x10-3)^2 metres x 1.00019955x10^-2
metres]=2.1946378x10^-5 m^3 = gravitational volume.

Using the quantum gravitational analogue to find the quantum volume we
have (c^2/h)(29.6904035)^3 = 3.550112576x10^54. Dividing quantum
gravitational volume by gravitational volume we have:

(2.1946378x10^-5)/(3.550112576x10^54)=6.18188x10^-60 local quantum
units.

(6.18188x10^-60)/c4pi=1.64093x10^-69 m^2. = (4.05084x10^-35)^2.
4.05084x10^-35 = Planck radius.

Date Subject Author
11/23/10 h.jones
11/28/10 h.jones
12/8/10 h.jones
12/14/10 h.jones
12/30/10 h.jones
1/8/11 h.jones
2/17/12 h.jones
2/18/12 h.jones
2/22/12 h.jones
2/22/12 h.jones
2/27/12 h.jones
3/17/12 haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/17/12 haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/19/12 haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/21/12 haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/22/12 haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/22/12 haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/24/12 haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/26/12 haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/19/11 h.jones
5/28/11 h.jones
6/21/11 h.jones
7/16/11 h.jones
8/6/11 h.jones
8/13/11 h.jones

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.