The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » nyshsmath

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: urgent question that needs a response
Replies: 18   Last Post: Feb 2, 2011 12:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 217
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: urgent question that needs a response
Posted: Feb 2, 2011 10:18 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (4.6 K)

So true and let's look at other nations and they do not have all students get on the "college" track.Guess what, they are ahead of us.We are not challenging the lowest students; we are frustrating them to a point of drop out and what about the brightest ones in the class? So frustrating, isn't it? We just want what is best for our students but sometimes it seems like no one is listening.
Iva Jean Tennant

-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Restive <>
Sent: Wed, Feb 2, 2011 9:51 am
Subject: Re: urgent question that needs a response

Liz I agree with you and have been saying this for years. I think we turn them off to school and education by forcing them to take courses that they simply are unable to do. I'm talking about a small percentage (not the lazy ones) . We have students that have an IQ below 85 and we make them take the Algebra Regents and fail, and then we allow them to get another diploma, but they have to FAIL first.
I think that in our zeal to give everyone a higher education we have gone overboard. College is not for everyone and it seems we are forcing it down their throats and I believe we only raise the dropout rate. Maybe if we took some of these kids and steered them in a different direction , a good trade for example, they would not be so turned off and frustrated and our dropout rate would not be so high.

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: urgent question that needs a response

I think administrators who think this 'rigor' will help the lowest students should be forced to sit through a Calc III class after years of being out of college and see how they do. Then maybe they'll understand the abuse they are handing our weakest students under the guise of 'challenging' them.

Liz Waite

-----Original Message-----
From: PJ Manzo <>
To: nyshsmath <>
Sent: Tue, Feb 1, 2011 6:40 pm
Subject: Re: urgent question that needs a response


Our school is huge, roughly 2,400 students. We have a tremendous amount of ELLs and SPEDS. Up until now, the 2 year Integrated Algebra and 2 year Geometry courses were perfect for these very low achieving students. (Mind you, some are refugees who have never been to school and can barely speak English)

We, too, have been told that starting next year only 1 year algebra and 1 year geometry will be offered. This has a lot to do with adding rigor to the school and creating a more challenging environment. I won't voice any opinions of my own on here, but I did want you to know you're not alone.

We'll just have to see what comes out of it. Either the kids with live up to the faster paced course, or... they won't.


PJ Manzo

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3418 - Release Date: 02/02/11 07:34:00

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.