Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: Pseudoteaching
Replies: 31   Last Post: Apr 19, 2011 9:35 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Robert Hansen

Posts: 7,489
From: Florida
Registered: 6/22/09
Re: Pseudoteaching
Posted: Feb 22, 2011 4:39 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Nice catch Josh. However, why do we not call it "pseudolearning"? It seems that students have a very high affinity to pseudolearning and it is very difficult to thwart without failing them in the process.

> Here's a working definition of "pseudoteaching" at
> (http://fnoschese.wordpress.com/pseudoteaching/):
>
> "Pseudoteaching is something you realize you?re doing
> after you?ve attempted a lesson which from the outset
> looks like it should result in student learning, but
> upon further reflection, you realize that it [sic]
> the very lesson itself was flawed and involved
> minimal learning."
>
> Another link here: (http://blog.mrmeyer.com/?p=9413).
>
> Now read some of those posts and behold a couple of
> not-really-surprising things: (a) open-ended,
> discovery learning is never or hardly ever
> pseudoteaching, and (b) little to no evidence is
> given for (a).
>
> All these inkhorn arguments for an already-accepted
> conclusion. These folks should be theologians.




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.