On Apr 5, 9:28 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 5:12 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 5, 3:25 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 10:21 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 4, 1:47 pm, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote: > > > > > > Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > You flat out refuse to allow the 2 basic tenets of the ZENNER TEST. > > > > > > 1/ 5:1 odds per trial > > > > > > 2/ Show the card after each guess. > > > > > > Point 2 is NOT a basic tenet of a Zener Test. Showing a card after > > > > > each guess makes card counting easier towards the end of the test. You > > > > > are given 25 guesses, the results are recorded, you are shown the > > > > > results at then of the test. > > > > > No further BullShit will be replied to. > > > > > That's the way they did it in Ghostbusters. > > > > Your authority is a movie? One that wasn't ever intended to be taken > > > seriously? > > > > > Tell you what. Every time I guess it wrong I get an electric shock! > > > > > AND every time I get it right YOU get an electric shock! > > > > > None of you have the balls > > > > None of us is crazy enough to want to be shocked one in five trials, > > > you mean. Change it to something that a real psychic would be able to > > > do, but a fraud wouldn't, and you'd get takers. For instance, try the > > > 1 in 50 odds you claimed you could regularly beat. > > > That would take 40 trials just to get something significant. > > > I've ALREADY STATED THE PROTOCOL > > You've stated a bunch of different ones, and generally change them > once the test is under way. > > > WTF IS YOUR PROBLEM. > > I'm sane and rational. To you, that's a problem. > > > I DON'T WANT ASSISTANCE DESIGNING THE TEST! > > That's right, you just want to design a test that's based on random > noise. > > > I DON'T DO A SINGLE GUESS - THE OPTIONS INTERFERE > > IOW, you have no special abilities, so you make a bunch of separate > guesses hoping one will be right. > > > I DONT DO STARS, WAVY LINES - THERE IS NO MOTIVE TO CHANNEL REPEATEDLY > > IOW, you don't do anything like Zener cards, though you keep going on > about them. > > > I DON'T DO HIGH ODDS - THE CONSISTENCY DROPS AND IT TAKES LONGER > > IOW, you only do tests where you have a good shot at "success" by > chance alone. > > > I DON'T GIVE ANSWERS YOU CAN QUICKLY CHECK - GOD DOESN'T PLAY DICE > > You don't give answers at all for anything meaningful---you just give > meaningless "channels", then demand to know what the answer was so you > can claim "success" by some bizarre association game. > > > I DON'T SCORE 2 WEEKS LATER - THE CHANNELS MUST BE COMPLETE AND > > ISOLATED > > We're still waiting for you to even *try* on the second trial with > Brad. You don't "score" at all for most tests. > > > JUST WORK WITH THE TEST PROTOCOL THAT I HAVE DESIGNED! > > > IT'S THAT SIMPLE! > > > NO BARGAINS! NO BETS! NO HIDING ANSWERS! NO VERBAL ASSAULT! NO > > CHANGES! NO SUGGESTIONS! NO DEBATE! NO COMPLAINTS! NO STATS FROM > > YOU! NO RATIONALE! NO DODGING! NO CONSTANT BRINGING UP THE SAME > > STUPID POINTS I'VE ANSWERED 20 TIMES EACH! > > > JUST PICK A F@CKING WORD AND TELE-ASK IT! > > There's no point in doing that, as you'll just change the rules > midgame again, and whine about how nobody will test you. You can't > stick with a protocol long enough to be tested. You're a fraud, you > know you're a fraud, and everyone else here (with a few possible > exceptions) knows you're a fraud
You're the biggest buffoon I've ever known BS.
All your counterarguments are trivial nonsense and counter to the fact that I DECIDE THE TEST METHOD.
Multi guesses 5 out of 25 instead of 1 out of 25 just speeds up the test for 5 TIMES LESS TRIALS.
That's 1 point! All the rest of your garbage is equally demonstrated as backpeddling.
You are immune to simple facts of scientific method.