|
|
Re: AUSTRALIAN SKEPTICS PRESIDENT REFUSES TO DO THIS PARANORMAL TEST!
Posted:
Apr 7, 2011 12:01 AM
|
|
On Apr 7, 9:28 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 10:05 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 5, 9:28 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 4, 5:12 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 5, 3:25 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 3, 10:21 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Apr 4, 1:47 pm, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > You flat out refuse to allow the 2 basic tenets of the ZENNER TEST.
> > > > > > > > 1/ 5:1 odds per trial
> > > > > > > > 2/ Show the card after each guess.
>
> > > > > > > Point 2 is NOT a basic tenet of a Zener Test. Showing a card after
> > > > > > > each guess makes card counting easier towards the end of the test. You
> > > > > > > are given 25 guesses, the results are recorded, you are shown the
> > > > > > > results at then of the test.
>
> > > > > > No further BullShit will be replied to.
>
> > > > > > That's the way they did it in Ghostbusters.
>
> > > > > Your authority is a movie? One that wasn't ever intended to be taken
> > > > > seriously?
>
> > > > > > Tell you what. Every time I guess it wrong I get an electric shock!
>
> > > > > > AND every time I get it right YOU get an electric shock!
>
> > > > > > None of you have the balls
>
> > > > > None of us is crazy enough to want to be shocked one in five trials,
> > > > > you mean. Change it to something that a real psychic would be able to
> > > > > do, but a fraud wouldn't, and you'd get takers. For instance, try the
> > > > > 1 in 50 odds you claimed you could regularly beat.
>
> > > > That would take 40 trials just to get something significant.
>
> > > > I've ALREADY STATED THE PROTOCOL
>
> > > You've stated a bunch of different ones, and generally change them
> > > once the test is under way.
>
> > > > WTF IS YOUR PROBLEM.
>
> > > I'm sane and rational. To you, that's a problem.
>
> > > > I DON'T WANT ASSISTANCE DESIGNING THE TEST!
>
> > > That's right, you just want to design a test that's based on random
> > > noise.
>
> > > > I DON'T DO A SINGLE GUESS - THE OPTIONS INTERFERE
>
> > > IOW, you have no special abilities, so you make a bunch of separate
> > > guesses hoping one will be right.
>
> > > > I DONT DO STARS, WAVY LINES - THERE IS NO MOTIVE TO CHANNEL REPEATEDLY
>
> > > IOW, you don't do anything like Zener cards, though you keep going on
> > > about them.
>
> > > > I DON'T DO HIGH ODDS - THE CONSISTENCY DROPS AND IT TAKES LONGER
>
> > > IOW, you only do tests where you have a good shot at "success" by
> > > chance alone.
>
> > > > I DON'T GIVE ANSWERS YOU CAN QUICKLY CHECK - GOD DOESN'T PLAY DICE
>
> > > You don't give answers at all for anything meaningful---you just give
> > > meaningless "channels", then demand to know what the answer was so you
> > > can claim "success" by some bizarre association game.
>
> > > > I DON'T SCORE 2 WEEKS LATER - THE CHANNELS MUST BE COMPLETE AND
> > > > ISOLATED
>
> > > We're still waiting for you to even *try* on the second trial with
> > > Brad. You don't "score" at all for most tests.
>
> > > > JUST WORK WITH THE TEST PROTOCOL THAT I HAVE DESIGNED!
>
> > > > IT'S THAT SIMPLE!
>
> > > > NO BARGAINS! NO BETS! NO HIDING ANSWERS! NO VERBAL ASSAULT! NO
> > > > CHANGES! NO SUGGESTIONS! NO DEBATE! NO COMPLAINTS! NO STATS FROM
> > > > YOU! NO RATIONALE! NO DODGING! NO CONSTANT BRINGING UP THE SAME
> > > > STUPID POINTS I'VE ANSWERED 20 TIMES EACH!
>
> > > > JUST PICK A F@CKING WORD AND TELE-ASK IT!
>
> > > There's no point in doing that, as you'll just change the rules
> > > midgame again, and whine about how nobody will test you. You can't
> > > stick with a protocol long enough to be tested. You're a fraud, you
> > > know you're a fraud, and everyone else here (with a few possible
> > > exceptions) knows you're a fraud
>
> > You're the biggest buffoon I've ever known BS.
>
> > All your counterarguments are trivial nonsense and counter to the fact
> > that I DECIDE THE TEST METHOD.
>
> > Multi guesses 5 out of 25 instead of 1 out of 25 just speeds up the
> > test for 5 TIMES LESS TRIALS.
>
> > That's 1 point! All the rest of your garbage is equally demonstrated
> > as backpeddling.
>
> > You are immune to simple facts of scientific method.
>
> > Just a huge mental block you have.
>
> Nope, you just don't understand how random noise ruins the validity of
> your tests. You have no psychic ability, you know you don't, and we
> know you don't. That's about it
how come this random noise doesn't affect Zenner Card tests guessing 1
card from 5 options?
Anyway, I suggest we try to DUPLICATE our 1 succesful test but with
the much easier GUESSING WORDS rather than guessing WHICH QUESTION WAS
ASKED.
You pick 10 words, tele-ask 1 per day, shuffle, I make 3 guesses per
word, or 2 if you insist.
Agree to that Bruce and we'll make history I'm 99.99... recurring
certain of it!
|
|
