On Apr 8, 2:30 am, camgi...@hush.com wrote: > On Apr 8, 6:27 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote: > > > > > On 4/04/2011 12:29 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > > > > James Randi's new book coming out... > > > > THE MAGICIAN IN THE LABORATORY! > > > > I'm going to write my own > > > > THE UNTESTED MINDREADER > > > Cherry Picking Applications Is Not "Good Science" Randi! > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Actually if Skeptics all had labotamies I would have passed a psychic > > > test 10 years ago! > > > > All they have to do is listen to the applicants and follow the test > > > instructions, but none of them do, the $1,000,000 and $100,000AU > > > competition prizes are actually for a DEBATING COMPETITION! You have > > > to prove your claim is worthy, i.e. make a legallly tight contract of > > > the unprovable being provable! > > > Graham, your original claim to Randi was manifestly untestable. Despite > > multiple attempts online, you have failed to construct a testable claim > > which you can then substantiate. Why should Randi listen to you? > > > Sylvia > > stop lying. > > standard placebo test, which I detailed to aus skeptics. > > subjective is a mole hill, not a 10 year mountain.
So come up with an objectively measurable protocol to demonstrate your magic powers---one which shows a significant, repeatable deviation from random effects.
