On Apr 8, 10:35 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 9, 2:19 pm, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 9, 8:24 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote: > > > > > Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point > > > > involve the deity (or possibly weather .... > > Why do I get the feeling that went straight over his head? > > [BOB] > > > There are enough > > available catastrophes that you should be able to post one > > next week for the following week. > > [BOB] * > > > Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point > > involve the daily weather .... > > [HERC] > How about a daily weather forecast while we're at it? > > * = only 2 similar letters changed - deity->daily > > Impressed me when I misread 'diety' as > I PREDICT HERCS RESPONSE WILL BE ABOUT DAILY WEATHER..
Still went over your head. Sad, really. Bob, do you want to explain in small words, or should we just leave it?
