On Apr 11, 6:14 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote: > On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:51:16 -0700, the following appeared > in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>: > > > > >On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:35:35 -0700 (PDT), the following > >appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Graham Cooper > ><grahamcoop...@gmail.com>: > > >>On Apr 9, 2:19 pm, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> > On Apr 9, 8:24 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote: > > >>> > > Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point > >>> > > involve the deity (or possibly weather .... > > >>> Why do I get the feeling that went straight over his head? > > >>[BOB] > >>> There are enough > >>> available catastrophes that you should be able to post one > >>> next week for the following week. > > >>[BOB] * > >>> Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point > >>> involve the daily weather .... > > >Nope: "deity". As in (your repeated statement) "GOD (or > >GOES) DOESN'T PLAY DICE!". Whatever relevance that has... > > >>[HERC] > >>How about a daily weather forecast while we're at it? > > >Already answered; still waiting for *any* verifiable > >prediction... > > ><snip irrelevantia> > > Still waiting...
In that case you have a lifelong wait...
The only thing out of that quarter is lies, damned lies and unsubstantiated statistics ...
