|
|
Re: SKEPTICS SHOULD HAVE LABOTAMIES NOT LABORATORIES !!!
Posted:
Apr 11, 2011 5:44 PM
|
|
On Apr 12, 7:40 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:08:23 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by george <gbl...@hnpl.net>:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 11, 6:14 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:51:16 -0700, the following appeared
> >> in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>:
>
> >> >On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:35:35 -0700 (PDT), the following
> >> >appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Graham Cooper
> >> ><grahamcoop...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >>On Apr 9, 2:19 pm, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> > On Apr 9, 8:24 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> >> >>> > > Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point
> >> >>> > > involve the deity (or possibly weather ....
>
> >> >>> Why do I get the feeling that went straight over his head?
>
> >> >>[BOB]
> >> >>> There are enough
> >> >>> available catastrophes that you should be able to post one
> >> >>> next week for the following week.
>
> >> >>[BOB] *
> >> >>> Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point
> >> >>> involve the daily weather ....
>
> >> >Nope: "deity". As in (your repeated statement) "GOD (or
> >> >GOES) DOESN'T PLAY DICE!". Whatever relevance that has...
>
> >> >>[HERC]
> >> >>How about a daily weather forecast while we're at it?
>
> >> >Already answered; still waiting for *any* verifiable
> >> >prediction...
>
> >> ><snip irrelevantia>
>
> >> Still waiting...
>
> >In that case you have a lifelong wait...
>
> Yeah, but that fact (his inability to predict anything)
> needs to be reiterated occasionally.
>
> >The only thing out of that quarter is lies, damned lies and
> >unsubstantiated statistics ...
>
> I'd go with "delusions" rather than lies; it's yet to be
> demonstrated that he has the faintest idea what the truth
> actually is.
Nope! You guys are reverse engineering your denial (conclustions)
based on your ASSUMPTION that predicting catastrophes is impossible.
It's very clear.
14 DEC 2004 in same thread
"actually it was DARKFALZ, DAVID, MONTY, DAVID dark day mon day
just after I got the message 'you can predict catastrophe'"
THIS IS WHERE I CLARIFY THAT IT WAS A PREDICTION OF CATASTROPHE
BECAUSE I POSTED "DARK DAY MONDAY" ON A SUNDAY IN SCI.SKEPTIC
AND NOTHING HIT *THAT* MONDAY - THE NEXT DAY.
GROUPS: aus.tv SCI.SKEPTIC
SUBJECT: DARK DAY MONDAY
DATE: 12 DECEMBER 2004
TOPIC: Ouija Board message
FOLLOW UP POST 14 DEC - *I* can predict catastrophe
2 WEEKS LATER
BOXING DAY TSUNAMI HIT ON SUNDAY
|
|
