|
|
Re: SKEPTICS SHOULD HAVE LABOTAMIES NOT LABORATORIES !!!
Posted:
Apr 11, 2011 5:52 PM
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Graham Cooper
<grahamcooper7@gmail.com>:
>On Apr 11, 6:08 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 6:14 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:51:16 -0700, the following appeared
>> > in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>:
>>
>> > >On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:35:35 -0700 (PDT), the following
>> > >appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Graham Cooper
>> > ><grahamcoop...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > >>On Apr 9, 2:19 pm, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>> > On Apr 9, 8:24 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>> > >>> > > Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point
>> > >>> > > involve the deity (or possibly weather ....
>>
>> > >>> Why do I get the feeling that went straight over his head?
>>
>> > >>[BOB]
>> > >>> There are enough
>> > >>> available catastrophes that you should be able to post one
>> > >>> next week for the following week.
>>
>> > >>[BOB] *
>> > >>> Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point
>> > >>> involve the daily weather ....
>>
>> > >Nope: "deity". As in (your repeated statement) "GOD (or
>> > >GOES) DOESN'T PLAY DICE!". Whatever relevance that has...
>>
>> > >>[HERC]
>> > >>How about a daily weather forecast while we're at it?
>>
>> > >Already answered; still waiting for *any* verifiable
>> > >prediction...
>>
>> > ><snip irrelevantia>
>>
>> > Still waiting...
>>
>> In that case you have a lifelong wait...
>>
>> The only thing out of that quarter is lies, damned lies and
>> unsubstantiated statistics
>
>
>
>
>Here are 3 of my premonitions ON RECORD!
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_usubject=proof+of+god+0202+2002
>FEB 2 2002 I post PROOF OF GOD 02 02 2002 to a dozen newsgroups
>1 year to the day later the Space Shuttle exploded
No mention of the shuttle in that post. In fact, no stated
predictions at all.
>http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_usubject=dark-day-monday
>DEC 14 2004 A ouigee board warning of global catastrophe - DARK DAY
>MONDAY
>2 weeks before the Boxing Day Tsunami killed 100,000 people ON A
>SUNDAY
Here's what you posted and later claimed to have been a
"prediction" of the tsunami:
"my Ouigee board is playing up again.... hope its global and
not related to me!"
Wow, right on target! Not...
And BTW, that's "Ouija" board; your spelling makes it sound
like something used to clean windows. HTH...
>http://hercshome.com/my-fault.png
>Days before Queensland floods and cyclone.
>YOU GET HIT HARD AND IT KEEPS ON COMING (THE RAIN)
>Emailed to 50 Queensland Govt. departments
Your actual statement (from the referenced website):
"You get hit hard and it keeps on coming until you break."
No mention of rain. No mention of location or time, even
vaguely.
IOW, no prediction of anything meaningful.
>I'm not saying it's a simple matter that it's definitive,
>but that's 3 of the biggest natural disasters of the last decade
>predicted,
>and I don't make any predictions other than
>the ones that DO show some results.
So where are those predictions? The ones you referenced were
neither predictions nor useful.
Still waiting...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
|
