|
|
Re: SKEPTICS SHOULD HAVE LABOTAMIES NOT LABORATORIES !!!
Posted:
Apr 11, 2011 5:58 PM
|
|
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:10:08 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Graham Cooper
<grahamcooper7@gmail.com>:
>On Apr 11, 5:41 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 23:46:10 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 11, 12:48 pm, GovShill <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Apr 11, 11:06 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Apr 11, 6:08 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > On Apr 11, 6:14 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:51:16 -0700, the following appeared
>> >> > > > in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>:
>>
>> >> > > > >On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:35:35 -0700 (PDT), the following
>> >> > > > >appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Graham Cooper
>> >> > > > ><grahamcoop...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >> > > > >>On Apr 9, 2:19 pm, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > On Apr 9, 8:24 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point
>> >> > > > >>> > > involve the deity (or possibly weather ....
>>
>> >> > > > >>> Why do I get the feeling that went straight over his head?
>>
>> >> > > > >>[BOB]
>> >> > > > >>> There are enough
>> >> > > > >>> available catastrophes that you should be able to post one
>> >> > > > >>> next week for the following week.
>>
>> >> > > > >>[BOB] *
>> >> > > > >>> Need I (ahem!) predict that the response will at some point
>> >> > > > >>> involve the daily weather ....
>>
>> >> > > > >Nope: "deity". As in (your repeated statement) "GOD (or
>> >> > > > >GOES) DOESN'T PLAY DICE!". Whatever relevance that has...
>>
>> >> > > > >>[HERC]
>> >> > > > >>How about a daily weather forecast while we're at it?
>>
>> >> > > > >Already answered; still waiting for *any* verifiable
>> >> > > > >prediction...
>>
>> >> > > > ><snip irrelevantia>
>>
>> >> > > > Still waiting...
>>
>> >> > > In that case you have a lifelong wait...
>>
>> >> > > The only thing out of that quarter is lies, damned lies and
>> >> > > unsubstantiated statistics
>>
>> >> > Here are 3 of my premonitions ON RECORD!
>>
>> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_usubject=proof+of+god+0202+...
>> >> > FEB 2 2002 I post PROOF OF GOD 02 02 2002 to a dozen newsgroups
>> >> > 1 year to the day later the Space Shuttle exploded
>>
>> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_usubject=dark-day-monday
>> >> > DEC 14 2004 A ouigee board warning of global catastrophe - DARK DAY
>> >> > MONDAY
>> >> > 2 weeks before the Boxing Day Tsunami killed 100,000 people ON A
>> >> > SUNDAY
>>
>> >> >http://hercshome.com/my-fault.png
>> >> > Days before Queensland floods and cyclone.
>> >> > YOU GET HIT HARD AND IT KEEPS ON COMING (THE RAIN)
>> >> > Emailed to 50 Queensland Govt. departments
>>
>> >> > -------------
>>
>> >> > I'm not saying it's a simple matter that it's definitive,
>> >> > but that's 3 of the biggest natural disasters of the last decade
>> >> > predicted,
>> >> > and I don't make any predictions other than
>> >> > the ones that DO show some results.
>>
>> >> Given that a prediction is "a statement made about the future" I'd say
>> >> you are full of shit. Situation Normal.
>>
>> >> Shill #2
>>
>> >2 days later I explained DARK DAY MONDAY was "predict a catastrophe"
>>
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/1f3d3f27c20f32b2\
>>
>> >Message from discussion DARK DAY MONDAY
>>
>> >----8<-------------------
>>
>> >|-|erc View profile
>> >More options Dec 14 2004, 8:21 pm
>>
>> >Newsgroups: aus.tv, sci.skeptic
>> >From: "|-|erc" <h...@r.c>
>> >Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:21:20 +1000
>> >Local: Tues, Dec 14 2004 8:21 pm
>> >Subject: Re: DARK DAY MONDAY
>> >Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
>> >Report this message | Find messages by this author
>> >"Monty" <nomeneit...@hotmail.com> wrote in ...
>>
>> >> "|-|erc" <h...@r.c> wrote in messagenews:327rkgF3fqicnU1@individual.net...
>> >> > my Ouigee board is playing up again.... hope its global and not related
>> >> to me!
>>
>> >> > Herc
>> >> > --
>> >> > Capitalism meets Communism ~ limit 1 skyscraper per billionaire
>>
>> >> It's "Ouija" board - from the French "oui" and German "ja" both meaning
>> >> "yes". I'm not picking on you but a lot of people get this wrong. It's
>> >> what I use to drive suvvdj nuts.
>>
>> >just taking a stab at the spelling, weegee is even used.
>> >actually it was DARKFALZ, DAVID, MONTY, DAVID dark day mon day
>> >just after I got the message 'you can predict catastrophe'. gave me a
>> >shiver
>> >reading out the names..
>>
>> >Herc
>>
>> >-----------------------8<------------
>>
>> >DEC 14 - HERC "predict a catastrophe" "DARK DAY MONDAY"
>>
>> >DEC 26 - 100,000 DEAD mid Sunday
>>
>> Nope. Sorry. Don't see any statements made about the future in any of that
>> bullshit.
>>
>> Maybe I'm not crazy enough?
>
>
>just plain stupdity!
But not stupid enough to buy this BS.
>"actually it was DARKFALZ, DAVID, MONTY, DAVID dark day mon day
>just after I got the message 'you can predict catastrophe'"
>
>
>GROUPS: aus.tv SCI.SKEPTIC
>SUBJECT: DARK DAY MONDAY
>DATE: 12 DECEMBER 2004
>TOPIC: Ouija Board message
>FOLLOW UP POST 14 DEC - *I* can predict catastrophe
>
>2 WEEKS LATER
>BOXING DAY TSUNAMI HIT ON SUNDAY
>
>Any school kid can see it's a valid prediction and a hit.
Let's see...
No mention of the nature of the catastrophe.
No mention of the time of the catastrophe.
No mention of the location of the catastrophe.
No mention of *which* Monday.
Yeah, that's certainly a valid prediction, all right. Not.
Did you only have to take "Stupid 101" to post this kind of
crap, or was "Advanced Stupid" required?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
|
