BruceS
Posts:
148
Registered:
8/23/05
|
|
Re: SKEPTICS SHOULD HAVE LABOTAMIES NOT LABORATORIES !!!
Posted:
Apr 15, 2011 9:27 AM
|
|
On Apr 14, 3:01 pm, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote: > On Apr 15, 2:05 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 13, 3:45 pm, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 14, 6:37 am, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 14, 8:34 am, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 14, 3:40 am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote: > > > > > >> accurate. > > > > > > > >I can confidently predict the following: > > > > > > > >SOMETHING WILL HAPPEN SOMETIME SOON. > > > > > > > I stand in awe... ;-) > > > > > > > >There. Now prove me wrong. > > > > > > > Obviously I can't, which means that you are indeed psychic. > > > > > > Al least, by GrahamLogic. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Predicting the future is just one of my lesser powers. I can also > > > > > guess a number between 1 and 100. > > > > > > 37. > > > > > > Keep that number in your pocket, it might come in handy one day. > > > > > So that's where it got to.. > > > > I heard the owner dropped it while cavorting with 29... it's all quite > > > > a sordid tale > > > > And I am 1 for 1. > > > OK, hotshot. I'm thinking of an integer between 1 and 3. You only > > get one guess to prove you're psychic. If you get it right, all > > Usenet will hail your name, and you'll have a common fastener named > > for you. If you get it wrong, you'll have to hang your head in shame, > > and never crosspost to more than 100 ngs again. > > Before I guess the number you are thinking of, I'd normally request > three guesses, but this time, as proof of my powers, I will attempt it > in one guess. > > The text I am using is my latest copy of Pony Express. Page 32 Line 12 > "see a lot of workmanship issues in the trunk. We get one or two" > > Your number is 2 ! > > Thankyou. > (Holds envelope to forehead)
That is truly amazing; you're right! Are you sure you didn't cheat somehow? Note however that "2 !" can be more succinctly stated as "2", saving people the trouble of an onerous calculation.
|
|