BruceS
Posts:
153
Registered:
8/23/05
|
|
Re: SKEPTICS SHOULD HAVE LABOTAMIES NOT LABORATORIES !!!
Posted:
Apr 15, 2011 3:21 PM
|
|
On Apr 15, 8:33 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 12:10 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 15, 7:53 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 15, 11:24 pm, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 14, 9:13 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 15, 11:08 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Skeptics are all cheats who have never scored a single hit to anything
> > > > > > subjective in the last 100 years.
>
> > > > > Some skeptics can at least spell "lobotomy" correctly!
> > > > > --
>
> > > > You corrected his spelling, and didn't (AFAICT) have any spelling or
> > > > grammar errors in your post. Graham repeatedly claims this cannot be
> > > > done. Therefore, logically, your post does not exist.
>
> > > How do you construe that trivia as a spelling correction?
>
> > You misspelled the word "lobotomy" as "labotamy" (well actually, the
> > plural "labotamies"), and he corrected you. Ordinarily, that would be
> > considered a spelling flame. How is it perceived on your planet?
>
> He implied there was a spelling error, he didn't explicitly correct
> anyone or anything.
He corrected your spelling by giving the correct spelling as part of
his pointing out that you spelled it incorrectly. You are probably
the only one in this thread who doesn't recognize that as a correction
of your spelling.
> If you think you've found the definitive holy grail, a weakness in
> Genesis Adam's immortality field, then you're clearly mistaken and
> jumping to conclusions based on a very weak anecdote.
>
> I'm surprised I still have to explain such basics to you when you've
> been at this so long.
|
|
