On Apr 17, 6:15 pm, Alex <n...@leng.id.au> wrote: > In aus.tv Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 17, 5:54 pm, Alex <n...@leng.id.au> wrote: > >>In aus.tv Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Hey Alex, what about this post where, as predicted by my claim, > > >> > YOU FUCKED UP > > >> > while trying to correct me? > > >> Here's your claim *again*, Graham, so your usual dissembling and > >> outright lies can be compared: > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/f5be4541af273215?hl=en&dmod... > > >> The onus of proof is on you, Graham. Please indicate in your > >> original claim, as per *your* statement above ("as predicted > >> by my claim"), where you refer to the "infallibility" of > >> anyone other than yourself with regards to making mistakes in > >> a post. > > > So how that prove MY fallibility by YOU FUCKING UP?? > > Strawman noted. > > Poor Graham, you just really don't understand the dictates of > logical debate, do you? No wonder you're a "psychic" - you > just wouldn't be able to cope with any rudimentary scientific > endeavour... > > Are you going to make any reasonable attempt to justify your > latest claim, before it's also marked disproved? > > Graham Cooper's credibility: nil. > Graham Cooper's "immortality field" level: nil. > Graham Cooper's dignity: absent. > > Keep it up! > > Alex.
Sadly its you who don't understand the difference between an explanation and a Statement Of Claim, so all you have disproven is a one off explanation, after the fact of numerous other explanations that 'anybody can make a spelling correction given enough goes', which is EXACTLY what you did!
After you FUCKED UP BEAUTIFULLY ON CALL! BwaHAHAHa