The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Undo/Redo
Replies: 12   Last Post: Feb 13, 2014 1:01 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jakub Serych

Posts: 51
Registered: 1/27/08
Re: Undo/Redo
Posted: May 3, 2011 7:31 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

You are right, that undo/redo in Mathematica could be much more
complicated than in for example text editor. But undo/redo is not
the question of inversion of mathematical operations, but simply of
conservating the state of the computer before each operation and simple
returning that state back when undo/redo is needed.

Do you thing, that it is simple for example to return operation in
Photoshop, when I'm editing nearly 1GB large image (in the area of the
360 deg. panoramas, I'm playing with, it is not an unusual size)?

And Photoshop has not only perfectly working undo/redo (like many other
programs) but even very mature history tools, which can do much more
with the deep history of operations. Many of such image operations are
also pretty difficult and ireversibile mathematical algorithms.

So I realy don't understand, why undo/redo in Mathematica is so poor.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Rowe []
> Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 12:23 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Undo/Redo
> On 4/30/11 at 5:53 AM, (Barak Shoshany) wrote:

> >This seems to be a recurring subject in this group.
> >Mathematica is now at version 8 and there's still no multiple undo
> >and redo functionality. I don't understand how such an amazing piece
> >of software can lack such a trivial feature. Why isn't Woflram doing
> >anything about it? Heck, I'll even write the code for undo/redo
> >myself for them for free if they let me. Is there someone at Wolfram
> >I can complain on the matter? Perhaps an internet petition is in
> >order? What do you think?

> Simply put, implementation of undo/redo for something like
> Mathematica is far more complex than you suggest.
> Undo/redo in a text editor or word processor is manipulating
> what I will call static text, i.e., text that is to be
> read/printed etc that does not change the state of your machine,
> it not executed. This isn't the case for Mathematica.
> You really need to think about what you mean by say undo in the
> context of Mathematica. What does it mean to undo a computation?
> Keep in mind, many mathematical operations have no simple inverse.
> Reverting the state of a text document to a previous state is
> quite simple compared to doing the same for a Mathematica session.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.