On May 25, 12:59 am, Gemini Jonez <geminizjone...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 24, 10:48 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > ... but, yes; > > the travelling clone's image is just as much shifted > > as the nontravelling one's, ignoring the relativistic > > effects upon the one. > > > think of atoms as gyroscopes, or some thing, > > in trying to accelerate them, relativistically. > > But if you use that gyroscope analogy, you're already assuming some > things, like a constant location in the gravity well, which may not > apply for this problem, and doesn't seem to.
doesn't equation 6 (transformation rule) basically render the gyroscope analogy null and void in and of itself. I'd have to disagree with the gyro idea as well. It's kinda retarded even on it's mere premise.
