On Sun, 29 May 2011 08:35:02 +0100, "Sky.Watcher" <invalid@invalid.edu> wrote:
> >"Henry Wilson DSc." <..@..> wrote in message >news:3ij3u652vncmn5pds700ie8tps374ujiqb@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 29 May 2011 02:41:39 +0100, "Sky.Watcher" <invalid@invalid.edu>
>>>>>> Silly old pommie engineer type question... >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably the best indicator of the speed of gravity is the anomalous >>>>>> precession of the perihelion of Mercury... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> SR contradicts itself. Why try to defend any of it? >>>>>> http://www.scisite.info/wilson's_paradox.jpg >>>>> >>>>>You repeat this often. Do you have any evidence of SR claiming rubber >>>>>bands >>>>>contract? >>>> >>>> Freeze it if you like... >>>> SR claims all moving matter contracts...and you should know it. >>> >>>Actually I don't know it. I'd be interested if you could show me where SR >>>claims all moving matter contracts, but I suspect you don't know it >>>either. >>>-- Sky.Watcher >> >> You're obviously new here. I wont bother to explain.. > >All right, I won't bother to read your ridiculous nonsense. You've obviously >no idea what you are talking about.
>Goodbye. >-- Sky.Watcher
What's your real motive? You haven't contributed anything scientific. You aapparently don't know anything about SR...so I can only assume you are just part of the Einstein conspiracy, here to stifle any criticism of his stupid theory.
