On Mon, 30 May 2011 00:33:33 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.May.2011> wrote:
> >"Henry Wilson DSc." <..@..> wrote in message >news:7oj5u6tesgpis8okrrfvkruka8h3udujfa@4ax.com... >| On Sun, 29 May 2011 23:41:24 +0100, "Androcles" >| <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.May.2011> wrote: >| >| > >| >"Henry Wilson DSc." <..@..> wrote in message >| >news:0qf5u65bdn0u9gder3a002ngsu973m7118@4ax.com... >| >| On Sun, 29 May 2011 11:47:38 +0100, "Androcles" >| >| <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.May.2011> wrote: >| >| >| >| > >| >| >"Henry Wilson DSc." <..@..> wrote in message >| >| >news:n934u6tlbfkrqt20ci5aujkfuja66eujor@4ax.com... >| >| >| On Sun, 29 May 2011 08:35:02 +0100, "Sky.Watcher" ><invalid@invalid.edu> >| >| >| wrote: >| >| >| >| >| >>>claims all moving matter contracts, but I suspect you don't know >it >| >| >| >>>either. >| >| >| >>>-- Sky.Watcher >| >| >| >> >| >| >| >> You're obviously new here. I wont bother to explain.. >| >| >| > >| >| >| >All right, I won't bother to read your ridiculous nonsense. You've >| >| >obviously >| >| >| >no idea what you are talking about. >| >| >| >| >| >| >Goodbye. >| >| >| >-- Sky.Watcher >| >| >| >| >| >| What's your real motive? You haven't contributed anything >scientific. >| >You >| >| >| aapparently don't know anything about SR...so I can only assume you >are >| >| >just >| >| >| part of the Einstein conspiracy, here to stifle any criticism of his >| >| >stupid >| >| >| theory. >| >| >| >| >| >| >| >| >Looks to me like he was asking you a question you couldn't answer. >| >| >You've lost that one, Wilson, he isn't bothering with you anymore. >| >| >I won't bother to explain. >| >| >| >| He's obviously turned up here one day, read some of your crap and then >| >| accused me of being wrong. >| >| >| >| I showed you where Einstein clearly stated that moving matter contracts >by >| >| 1/gamma in his 1905 paper. >| > >| >You haven't given me one single citation for gamma, and 2 is shorter than >1. >| >I won't bother to explain how fucking stupid that is. >| >| >| >| I also explained to you that Einstein's theory is nothing more than a >| >| corruption of LET whereby every individual observer is at rest in his >own >| >| personal aether. Hence the maths of LET and SR are identical. >| > >| >According to the dyscalculiac Alf "Daisy" Baggage, 1/2 is identical to >2/1. >| >I won't bother to explain how fucking stupid that is. >| >| Look it's quite simple really. >| >| When Einstein wrote "it becomes shorter in the ratio of 1: sqrt(...)..." >| he obviously meant it was initially '1' and 1/gamma when moving. > >Look, it's quite simple really. >When the Greeks wrote their alpha, beta: > http://www.keyway.ca/gif/greek2.gif >we English speaking people didn't call it an alphagamm, we >called it an alphabet. >Only pet chimps and Einstein Dingleberries talk about gamma, >Einstein used beta = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2). >I won't bother to explain how fucking stupid you are, but you >are not only dyslexic, you suffer from dyscalculia also. This >is a sure indication of very low intelligence, matching little eric >and Phuckwit Duck.
I only reply to your messages because it provides me with good practice for answering the more accomplished dickheads here.
