Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Replies: 108   Last Post: Jun 17, 2011 2:07 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
hanson

Posts: 1,620
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Posted: May 31, 2011 12:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Chris.B" <chris.b@nypost.dk> wrote:
"I, Chris. B, am a an Interrllektuall snob, a Born again
anti-Semite and a brain-damaged cripple, who is bored
to death with the point of this whole, very foolish exercise."
>
hanson wrote:
Sheesh, Chris, please. Do not fail to respond to his,
which would be for the 27th time now. Chris, you are
a heroic enabler, no matter what your condition is, to
publicize essential, little known facts about
<http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock>
wherein it says:

--- KW, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:
---- Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
----- "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>
hanson wrote:
Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he
folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked
the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,....
Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso:
>
|||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to
|||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they
|||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality."
|||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact
|||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?"
|||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
|||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous
|||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire
|||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included."
|||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber".
|||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)]
< http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein >
>
So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy
career-journey which concludes, long last, with what
most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time,
if not outright from the start, that:
====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ======
===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ====
>
Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after
he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then
noble political agenda. (2)
<http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein> (1)
<http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2> (1)
<http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft> (1)
<http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity> (2)
<http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR> (2)
>
GR/SR is a useless crock o'shit, save it being
"a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries
to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said
not to do that.
>
Professor Panteltje wrote:
I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'.
He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter.
If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein
would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again",
is really really bad.
He had no clue, and died without one.
That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great
scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake,
as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science
with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding.
>
KW wrote:
Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a
true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein
Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits:
>
** FAITH IS THEORY
** LYING IS TEACHING
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** BULLSHIT IS TRUTH
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
>
Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass
is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although
never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is
negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity.
<shrug>
>
Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the
Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density.
In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero.
>
hanson wrote:
Revisiting an earlier discussion:
<http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question>
Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years
before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as
G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2.
Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate
G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe
Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession
and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2.
<http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein>
<http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2>
<http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft>
>
Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists,
current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's
sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years,
experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be:
G = H^2/rho
wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the
mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some
small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can
be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic
envelope as
c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4
IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted shit has
any use in the here and real universe that we
live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment.
>
KW continued & wrote:
However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the
mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes
repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest
antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar was just so fucking ignorant that this
nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim
negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there.
<shrug>
>
Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark
Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the fuck
does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance.
After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the
plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of
these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry
worshipping. <shrug>
>
Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists
exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by
Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal
solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically
symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild's original solution
does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let's look at the
Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified
through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of
gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of
this discussion, they are ignored.
>
** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 - dr^2 / (1 + K / r) - r^2 dO^2
Where
** K = One of the many integration constants
** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2
>
Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from
gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin-
point this particular integration constant as the following besides
through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always
20/20. <shrug>
>
** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement
>
This point collaborates with Professor Ponte's astute observation of
how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned
<shrug>




--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---


Date Subject Author
5/22/11
Read Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/22/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
donstockbauer@hotmail.com
5/22/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
donstockbauer@hotmail.com
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
donstockbauer@hotmail.com
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
pnalsing@gmail.com
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
pnalsing@gmail.com
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
bradguth@gmail.com
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
bradguth@gmail.com
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
bradguth@gmail.com
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/28/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/28/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/28/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/28/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Helmut Wabnig
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Androcles
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Helmut Wabnig
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Androcles
6/3/11
Read Wabning - Andro -- Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/14/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/14/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/15/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/15/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/17/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/17/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/17/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/17/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.