Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Replies: 108   Last Post: Jun 17, 2011 2:07 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
hanson

Posts: 1,490
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Posted: Jun 1, 2011 12:32 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Loudmouthing "Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat>
is jealous again, exposed his smegma, bragged & wrote: ...
>
> "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

>>The interns & recruits here hope that you did enjoy
>>your links which were not opened nor read here.
>>It is far more important to us that you will stay and
>>be coming back for the 29th time and continue to
>>be our chief enabler & facilitator to publicize these
>>essential but little known facts about Einstein & his
>>Relativity work, on SR & GR, in
>><http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock>
>>wherein it says:

>>>
>>--- KW, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>---- Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>----- "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:

>>>
>>hanson wrote:
>>Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he
>>folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked
>>the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,....
>>Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso:

>>>
>>|||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to
>>|||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they
>>|||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality."
>>|||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact
>>|||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?"
>>|||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
>>|||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous
>>|||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire
>>|||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included."
>>|||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber".
>>|||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)]
>>< http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein >

>>>
>>So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy
>>career-journey which concludes, long last, with what
>>most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time,
>>if not outright from the start, that:
>>====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ======
>>===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ====

>>>
>>Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after
>>he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then
>>noble political agenda. (2)
>><http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein> (1)
>><http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2> (1)
>><http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft> (1)
>><http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity> (2)
>><http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR> (2)

>>>
>>GR/SR is a useless crock o'shit, save it being
>>"a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries
>>to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said
>>not to do that.

>>>
>>Professor Panteltje wrote:
>>I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'.
>>He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter.
>>If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein
>>would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
>>Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again",
>>is really really bad.
>>He had no clue, and died without one.
>>That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great
>>scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake,
>>as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science
>>with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding.

>>>
>>KW wrote:
>>Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a
>>true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein
>>Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits:

>>>
>>** FAITH IS THEORY
>>** LYING IS TEACHING
>>** NITWIT IS GENIUS
>>** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
>>** PARADOX IS KOSHER
>>** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
>>** BULLSHIT IS TRUTH
>>** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
>>** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
>>** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
>>** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
>>** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
>>** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS

>>>
>>Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass
>>is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although
>>never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is
>>negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity.
>><shrug>

>>>
>>Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the
>>Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density.
>>In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero.

>>>
>>hanson wrote:
>>Revisiting an earlier discussion:
>><http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question>
>>Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years
>>before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as
>>G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2.
>>Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate
>>G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe
>>Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession
>>and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2.
>><http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein>
>><http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2>
>><http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft>

>>>
>>Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists,
>>current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's
>>sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years,
>>experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be:
>>G = H^2/rho
>>wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the
>>mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some
>>small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can
>>be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic
>>envelope as
>>c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4
>>IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted shit has
>>any use in the here and real universe that we
>>live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment.

>>>
>>KW continued & wrote:
>>However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the
>>mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes
>>repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest
>>antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the
>>plagiarist, and the liar was just so fucking ignorant that this
>>nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim
>>negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this
>>nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there.
>><shrug>

>>>
>>Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark
>>Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the fuck
>>does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance.
>>After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the
>>plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the
>>plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of
>>these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry
>>worshipping. <shrug>

>>>
>>Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists
>>exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by
>>Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal
>>solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically
>>symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild's original solution
>>does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let's look at the
>>Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified
>>through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of
>>gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of
>>this discussion, they are ignored.

>>>
>>** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 - dr^2 / (1 + K / r) - r^2 dO^2
>>Where
>>** K = One of the many integration constants
>>** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2

>>>
>>Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from
>>gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin-
>>point this particular integration constant as the following besides
>>through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always
>>20/20. <shrug>

>>>
>>** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement
>>>
>>This point collaborates with Professor Ponte's astute observation of
>>how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned
>><shrug>
>>
>>"Chris.B" wrote:
>>I fully agree with what KW, JP & hanson said above.
>>I adore and revere Koobee Wublee, Jan Panteltje and hanson
>>I am honored to be on the poster list as an appendage..
>>I have requested them to repost his note every time
>>I do respond to it. I need to see this post every day.
>>It makes me feel being intelligent and smart like they are.
>>I don't know any arithmetic nor algebra at all.
>>My personal negativity (see my google group profile) and
>>my extreme OCD, NPD & Megalomenia disorders which
>>are compounded by my Napoleon complex, that is driven
>>by my Quixotic dueling fantatsies, show that I, Chris. B,
>>am a an intellectual snob, a Born again anti-Semite (see
>>my picture) and a brain-damaged cripple. All of this which
>>I have posted, do force and compel me to be like this &
>>it's reflected in my <http://tinyurl.com/Picture-of-Chris-B>

>
>>hanson wrote:
>>My, my, oh dear, Chris, you are surely in one sorry &
>>sad mess. Your semi-belle belletristics as well as your
>>proletarian poetry that you post seem to ameliorate the
>>anxieties that are caused by your many mental maladies.

>
>>This excise here, for you to repeatedly ask and get your
>>wish fulfilled is our part of assisting you to feel better.
>>This symbiotic relationship here helps you, who is off the
>>rocker to "get your rocks off", and we get the chance to
>>inform the public to be very wary of Einstein Dingleberries.
>>So, thanks, Chris. Get well.... ahahaha... ahahahahanson

>
Wabie said:
> If only hanson would stop to decorate his diatribes
> with cut and paste formulas, which he does not
> understand, nor does he know what they mean.
>

hanson wrote:
.... ahahahaha.. So, Wabie,. you could not control
yourself, but you had to smear your Smegma on &
over Chris B, my friend, who's the very best enabler &
facilitator, I was ever privilege to have, by his continued,
now his 30th & ongoing request, to publicize these
essential but little known facts about Einstein & his
Relativity work, in
<http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock>
>
So Wabie, do you wanna be an additional helper
or do you have your eye on Chris Bs job?
>
Here is your chance then, Wabie. It's your call now.
Since YOU insinuate to understand do explain then
these equations from the above. Do it Smegma-Wabnig
I would be impressed to hear your explanations since your
wisdom is usually contained in these rolls of your smegma.
Do it without invoking your usual 1-liner-help tools like when
>
|||| Wabnigger said: "US soldiers are computer kids in bunkers"
|||| Wabnigger said: "I have seen an UFO yesterday!"
|||| Wabnigger said: "I am an Einstein Dingleberry!"
||| Wabnigger said: "Convert to the ONE & ONLY Religion of Relativity"
||| Wabnigger said: "Nobody on the internet knows that I am a dog"
|||| Wabnigger said: "Thank God that I am an Atheist"
|||| Wabnigger said: "Nothing matters... that's all that matters"
|||| Wabnigger said: "GPS has a 38000 sec delay time"
|||| Wabnigger said: "Relativity is wrong cuz Einstein was a Jew."
|||| Wabnigger said: "A ghost-driver is on the motorway!"
|||| Wabnigger said: "It's a good life sitting under the date palm tree"
|||| Wabnigger said: "Judaism & Islam are consistent in that respect"
|||| Wabnigger said: "demontage all Israel, Stone by stone, brick by brick"
|||| Wabnigger said: "I can see Angels"
|||| Wabnigger said: "I know the smegma smell of confessions"
|||| Wabnigger said: "on typos: I know it, but my fingers didn't".
|||| Wabnigger said: "I may be dumb, BUT I VOTE !"
>
<http://tinyurl.com/Nazi-Wabnig-is-a-US-Jew-hater>
<http://tinyurl.com/Wabnigs-GPS-Dingleberries>
<http://tinyurl.com/Potter-explains-GPS-to-Wabnig>
<http://tinyurl.com/Helmut-Wabnig-is-a-stupid-fuck>








Date Subject Author
5/22/11
Read Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/22/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
donstockbauer@hotmail.com
5/22/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
donstockbauer@hotmail.com
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
donstockbauer@hotmail.com
5/23/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
pnalsing@gmail.com
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
pnalsing@gmail.com
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/24/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
bradguth@gmail.com
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
bradguth@gmail.com
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
bradguth@gmail.com
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/26/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/27/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/28/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/28/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/28/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/28/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/29/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/30/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/31/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Helmut Wabnig
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Androcles
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Helmut Wabnig
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Androcles
6/3/11
Read Wabning - Andro -- Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/1/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
5/25/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/14/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/14/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/15/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/15/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/16/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/17/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/17/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson
6/17/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Chris.B
6/17/11
Read Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
hanson

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.