Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: Einstein, the crackpot's Croq
Posted:
Jun 1, 2011 5:00 PM
|
|
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:08:35 +0100, "Androcles"
<Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.June.2011> wrote:
(snip, because physics is not relevant here)
>|
>| If only hanson would stop to decorate his diatribes with cut and paste
>| formulas, which he does not understand, nor does he know what they
>| mean.
>|
>In hypothetical sentences introduced by 'if' and referring to
> past time, where conditions are to be deemed 'unfulfilled',
> the verb will regularly be found in the pluperfect subjunctive,
> in both protasis and apodosis.
>-- Donet, "Principles of Elementary Latin Syntax"
>
>If only wabnigger had a 'then' or 'else' in which to find the conclusion.
>
Thank you, Andro for your kind private lesson.
Of course you are right, needless to say,
but in the above diatribe I intentionally left the conclusio
to everyman's imagination.
It has always been a great pleasure to read your postings, Andro,
except when they deteriorate into repetitive laziness.
How often have we seen that equation posted by you,
A + B = B + A
which seems to be disturbing your creativity.
The same laudatio applies to hans hanson.
Please feel your name included in above sentences,
until to the paragraph which mentions lazyness and repetitivity.
You are really becoming repetitive, hans, can't that be improved?
It is a torture scanning every post of yours for the one new line.
w.
|
|
|
|
