On Jun 14, 11:44 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com> wrote: > ah, it's hoepless, you don't want to converse > on the matter. you are relying on a pin-headed interpretation > of an old experiment that, apparently, Galileo also got wrong. > > clay doth "nonlinearly" deform, and what are you going to do about it? > > nothing, again, and keep-on "refuting" Liebniz's *vis viva*. > > (you should refute the rest of his ****, two; > their is still lots of his stuff that has not been translated > into English, even, not that language is your God-am fort.)
Dear idiot 1tree: At no point have I ever said that the deformation of clay is linear or non-linear! My dropped ball experiment measures the EQUALITY of KE of two same size but different weight balls. If the KE is equal, the dents in the clay will be identical. Case closed! ? NE ?
