Kathy
Posts:
103
Registered:
8/17/06


Re: Re: algebra regents 2011
Posted:
Jun 17, 2011 5:52 PM


I believe you were correct. To make a solid edge implies that the boundary is in the solution when it is not  in fact I warned my group before we started that if a student chose a point on the dotted line to be a point in the solution set that it was incorrect. (And we had at least one that did.)
Kathy Noftsier  Original Message  From: "luisahaw" <luisahaw@aol.com> To: <nyshsmath@mathforum.org>; "Vera Sinnreich" <v_sinnreich@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 5:29 PM Subject: Re: Re: algebra regents 2011
>I was assigned to grade question 39. I gave a paper only 3 points because >the student chose to box in the solution space. He used a solid line when >it clearily was suppose to be dotted. The student's teacher argued with >me stating he did use a dotted line for the lower part of the inequality >_3x +7. the part that was not the solution space. She insists thats how >she teaches it. She expected the student to have a perfect paper, but he >already missed a multiple choice. > > So was I too strict with the 4 point rubric? I didn't think so. Now there > is no telling if she will change my score without my knowledge. Thanks > > Luisa Duerr > Binghamton > >  > This AOL Mail was sent from AT&T's Wireless network using Mobile Email > > Original Message > From: Vera Sinnreich <v_sinnreich@hotmail.com> > To: <nyshsmath@mathforum.org> > Date: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:35:43 PM UTC > Subject: Re: algebra regents 2011 > > I found question 22 poorly worded and ambiguous. The independent variable > could be the cost (I think they meant "the price") of carrots, in which > case choice 2 would be the correct response. Had the problem stated that > "a study showed that DECREASING the price of ..." this would be a fair > assumption However, in "A DECREASE in the cost of ...", the decrease > itself is the subject and, thus, the variable being discussed. In this > case, the correct response would be choice 1. > > I am fairly certain that the author of this question had the first > scenario in mind and, this scenario being the more conventional one, that > most people reading this question , students and teachers alike, will read > it in that way. But we cannot insist on precise mathematical language in > our students' communication unless we are willing to hold ourselves > accountable to the same standards. And the second interpretation is > linguistically more appropriate. Thus, in my humble opinion, both answers > should be accepted as correct. > > In the light of the changes in the scoring policy, by which we cannot > revisit exams with scores close to 65, we owe it to our students to > maximize their opportunities right from the start. If you agree, please > contact SED at (518) 4748220. > ******************************************************************* > * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message > * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org > * > * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at > * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671 > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* > * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message > * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org > * > * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at > * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671 > *******************************************************************
******************************************************************* * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org * * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671 *******************************************************************

