The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » nyshsmath

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: algebra regents 2011
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jun 20, 2011 3:05 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Evan Romer

Posts: 168
Registered: 1/8/09
Re: algebra regents 2011
Posted: Jun 19, 2011 5:10 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

This has been bothering me since I read it yesterday (the last
sentence). When the state says that "each exam is to be scored by a
committee of at least three teachers," I don't think they meant,""each
exam is to be scored by a committee of at least three teachers, and
then the score can be changed by an individual teacher afterward." In
fact, see the section on "The Finality of Examination Scores" which
begins, "When the teacher scoring committee completes the scoring
process, test scores must be considered final and must be entered onto
students' permanent records."

For a teacher to change a score is unprofessional and unethical.
Teachers who do so can be, and have been, brought up on 3020a changes
and dismissed. As teachers grading our own exams, we have a
responsibility to maintain professional standards.

Remember too, that in cases like this where the scoring committee
cannot agree, you can always call Albany for a ruling. My school calls
maybe 1 to 5 times each June. We call especially if we're not sure how
to score a response and we see that response on a lot of papers.

In the specific example Luisa gives, I'm not sure how Albany would
rule. I could see them going either way.

Evan Romer
Susquehanna Valley HS

On Jun 17, 2011, at 5:29PM, luisahaw wrote:

> I was assigned to grade question 39. I gave a paper only 3 points
> because the student chose to box in the solution space. He used a
> solid line when it clearily was suppose to be dotted. The
> student's teacher argued with me stating he did use a dotted line
> for the lower part of the inequality _3x +7. the part that was not
> the solution space. She insists thats how she teaches it. She
> expected the student to have a perfect paper, but he already missed
> a multiple choice.
> So was I too strict with the 4 point rubric? I didn't think so. Now
> there is no telling if she will change my score without my
> knowledge. Thanks
> Luisa Duerr
> Binghamton

* To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message
* "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to
* Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.