|
|
Re: a contradiction worth reading (unless a silly mistake was made)
Posted:
Jul 19, 2011 2:47 PM
|
|
On Jul 19, 3:34 pm, quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT), Simon Roberts
>
> <2ass...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I agree with you on all accounts. The first part of the proof
> >is scattered (but I believe is correct)
>
> No it's not correct.
>
> Use the counterexample I provided to find your _first_ error.
>
> >and I found the error in the second part.
>
> >I will try to review and correct my work before posting.
>
> No, not just review -- also _test_ it against actual data.
>
> quasi
o.k. I see, but still haven't found error in first part other than a
counter example. except that maybe "e<(p-1)" not "e<(p-1)/2" but I
don't see why. I keep digging.
|
|
