Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » nyshsmath

Topic: PARCC
Replies: 16   Last Post: Aug 22, 2011 1:57 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jonathan Halabi

Posts: 102
Registered: 8/16/08
Re: Geometry #21
Posted: Aug 18, 2011 10:53 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (7.0 K)

In a kite, neither pair of sides is parallel.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:32 AM, elizwaite@aol.com wrote:

> I believe isosceles trapezoid is correct. Although I do recall an
> earlier conversation on this list from several years ago where a few
> people defined a trapezoid as a quadrilateral with AT LEAST one pair
> of parallel sides where most of us used EXACTLY one pair of parallel
> sides. This would make a difference, I think.
> Liz Waite
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan <jd2718@gmail.com>
> To: nyshsmath <nyshsmath@mathforum.org>
> Sent: Thu, Aug 18, 2011 10:24 am
> Subject: Geometry #21
>
> The diagonals of a quadrilateral are congruent but do not bisect eac
> other. The quadrilateral is:
>
> Iso trapezoid
> Parallelogram
> Rectangle
> Rhombus
>
> But none of these are necessarily correct (kite, anyone?)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Iva Jean Tennant <tennantij@aol.com>
> wrote:
>

>> Hi All-
>> Sorry this is a bit late, but I have been away for the last week. I
>> hope you are all enjoying some time off over the summer.
>> I know most of you have seen the news around the release of the
>> PARCC Model Content Frameworks for public comment. For those of you
>> who have not, read on.
>> · The Model Content Frameworks in Mathematics and English l
>> anguage arts/literacy were released for public review on August 3r
>> d, after several rounds of feedback from the PARCC states. This p
>> ublic review period is an opportunity for an even wider group of i
>> nterested parties to provide feedback on all parts of the framewor
>> ks, including the introductions and the grade level analyses, whic
>> h contain suggested areas of emphasis and priority.
>> · By following the this link, http://www.parcconline.org/parcc-content-framework
>> s, you will be able to review the draft Model Content Frameworks a
>> nd provide your feedback through an on-line survey. All feedback
>> is due to PARCC by Wednesday, August 17th.
>> During this public review period, PARCC hopes that teachers
>> in particular will provide their feedback on the draft Model
>> Content Frameworks. While teachers have helped to develop the
>> frameworks to this point, the feedback of a broader group of
>> educators is critical. The Model Content Frameworks are being
>> shared directly with NCTM, NCSM, NCTE, AFT, and NEA, as well as
>> others, so these organizations can share them with their members,
>> as well.
>>
>>
>> ·
>>
>> John Svendsen
>> Mathematics Associate
>> Office of Curriculum and Instruction
>> NYS Education Department
>> EB 320
>> Albany, N.Y. 12234
>> (518) 474-5922
>> (518) 486-1385 (fax)
>> jsvendse@mail.nysed.gov
>> http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/mst/math/home.html
>> www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai
>>
>>

>



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.