On 20 Aug., 21:01, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> If there is no such thing as |R, why are you referring to it as if there > were? > Have you ever seen a proof by contradiction? Like that starting with the assumption let sqrt(2) = m/n ? > > > > > Since your conclusion is wrong, there is at least one step in your > > > argument which is wrong. > > > Or set theory with its claim of finished infinity is inconsistent. > > Which neither you nor anyone else has ever been able to establish, > despite years of futile attempts.