Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » nyshsmath

Topic: PARCC
Replies: 16   Last Post: Aug 22, 2011 1:57 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Roberta M. Eisenberg

Posts: 233
Registered: 10/9/09
Re: Geometry #21
Posted: Aug 22, 2011 1:57 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (2.5 K)

Re: Jonathan's message

The diagonals of a quadrilateral are congruent but do not bisect eac other. The quadrilateral is:

Iso trapezoid
Parallelogram
Rectangle
Rhombus

But none of these are necessarily correct (kite, anyone?)


I'm a little behind the times getting back to this question because I have been away a lot lately.

For a change, I have no problem with the wording of this question. Since the 2nd condition, that the diags do not bis each other, does not hold for three of the four choices, they cannot possibly be the answer. Therefore, I believe that "is" rather than "could be" is the correct usage.

While we're on the issue of grammar, "none of these are" is incorrect because "none" is short for "not one"; it should read "none of these is". Similarly, saying things like "no problems arise" (and many similar expressions) should be "no problem arises".

OK. I'm off my soapbox.

Bobbi






Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.