On Sep 21, 8:27 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote: > Graham Cooper wrote: > > On Sep 19, 6:02 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote: > >> Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Sep 19, 11:07 am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote: > > >>>>> Will anyone volunteer to think of a word while I mind read it? > > >>>> Yes. I just thought of a word. Tell me what it is. > > >>> BOW-DITCH = RENEGER! > > >> Wrong. > > >>> Too easy! > > >> Too hard. > > > aus skeptics are a bunch of geriatrics spouting bullshit about > > scientific method. > > > what are their catalogued results? the experiments that went in their > > favour. > > Where are the catalogued results from your tests, that went in your favour? > > Oh that's right, 10 years and no favourable results at all, only results > that with almost all certainty prove that your claims are false.
Nope! I scored nearly 100% reading BruceS mind.
He 'shifted the answer' away from 2 of my guesses, in order the munge the results to make sure I didn't use a dictionary attack.
The 2 answers he munged were easy to score a hit too. (Go figure!)
My actual score was 7 right out of 11. (+2 bad munges = 9/11 possible)
I defeated 20:1 ODDS on the first mindreading test of this kind.
If someone else was tested in the matching phase using my guesses and scored 9/11 it would demonstrate closer to 200:1 ODDS BROKEN!
It was Serendipity I passed at all!
Bruce refusing to append a random private key to his answers like
4 WILL I BUY A RETIREMENT HOUSE IN 2011? 329829874239823789
Instead BruceS (against my wishes) just munged the question
4 WILL I BE ABLE TO GET THE RETIREMENT HOUSE IN 2011?
This is what I had to go on..
That actually worked! And the 32349834843894389 DOESN'T