Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: layer logic: a new dimension to logic?
Replies: 12   Last Post: May 26, 2013 10:56 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Oskar Trestone

Posts: 18
From: Germany
Registered: 9/17/11
Re: layer logic: a new dimension to logic?
Posted: Oct 8, 2011 12:43 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Hello,

at first sight, layer theory might look like Russell´s theory of types, but it is different in essential aspects:

Yes, the layers have a kind of hierarchy:
In layer t the truth values of (any) statement in layer t or higher are not ´known´:
The layers are ´blind´ to themselves or higher layers.
But as meta statements have to have the same truth values in all layers (except layer 0), there is an important exception.

In layer set theory sets can be elements of themselves and the set of all sets is a normal set,
antinmomies are avoided by respecting the layers.

The main price we have to pay is a more complicated construction of (logical) truth and truth values,
that become a kind of infinite truth vectors like (u,true,true,false,true,false,false, false,true, ...).

But if we get a theory without contradictions and a easier handling of infinity (just one kind),
this might be worth a try.

Yours
Trestone



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.