In article <555ee14b-369a-44d5-9c8d-5c450c2b73a4@q26g2000vby.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 8 Okt., 14:40, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 8, 4:57 am, Alfonso <Alfo...@duffadd.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > This "ladder" is not a useful concept. > > > > Why not? > > Because there is not the least result that could be used in > mathematics or elsewhere. The only "benefit" is an expansion of > matheology and of its unjustified claim that mathematics would depend > on it. > > Astrology is by far more useful.
I can believe that astrology may well be much more useful to WM that any of the mathematics under discussion hear. --
