In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 12 Okt., 20:53, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > Actually its width MUST be larger than every line > > > > > But its width is spanned by the lines. There is nothing more. > > > > The width of such a triangle can only be spanned by its last line, if > > any, since every other line is necessarily shorter, thus not spanning > > the entire width. > > > > So when the triangle does not have a last line, as WM insists, there is > > nothing left to span it. > > That is correct. That is potential infinity. But by R(oo) = B(oo) then > there is no finished infinity of digits or symbols in the diagonal. > > And there is not a complete set of all natural indices.
There is in ZFC. And until WM can PROVE ZFC to be inconsistent, which he has not been able to do, that means in mathematics. > > > > > Only in WMstadt is the set of all natural numbers in any way > > problematical. In standard mathematics, it is one of the standards. > > And as we see, it falsifies the old mathematical theorem, that > Forall n in |N: H(n) = B(n) = R(n) > implies H(oo) = R(oo) = B(oo) > if existing
That is not an old, or new, theorem in any mathematics in which a complete set |N does not exist, but only in WM's mythematics.