On 14 Okt., 05:37, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> Start with an empty vase and at time -1/2^n inset n and n+1 into the > vase and remove the smallest natural from the vase and let H(n) be the > number of balls in the vase at time -1/2^n > > Start with an empty vase and at time -1/2^n inset n and n+1 into the > vase and remove the largest natural from the vase and let R(n) be the > number of balls in the vase at time -1/2^n > > Then H(n) = R(n) for all n but H(oo) = 0 and R(oo) = oo
That is obviously ridiculous. And that is your argument for further destruction of mathematics.
