In article <6266fa8f-77bf-4d5e-b301-bcda963d92e1@k35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 21 Okt., 21:23, SPQR <S...@roman.gov> wrote: > > In article > > <6fbcc6a3-45af-49a1-b257-8e698bd99...@x25g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > On 21 Okt., 11:15, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Correct. An infinite "triangle" has one or no vertices > > > > > An infinite Cantor-list has one or no vertices. > > > > Since there are at least two proofs of the uncountability of the reals > > Irrelevant in this context.
The existence of an unfaulted proof is always relevant to the truth of the theorem it proves.
> I will show you where the other proofs have gaps. But not before you > will have understood the proof under discussion, i.e., never, I'm > afraid.
Only someone who is afraid need ever claim not to be.
