|
|
Re: Cantor's Proofs
Posted:
Oct 22, 2011 4:36 AM
|
|
because only certain elements bond with other elements, there are
constraints on the
possibilities. By analogy a geophysicist has to use classical geology to
interpret the
data.
"Patricia Shanahan" wrote in message
news:9rCdnX1JJOS4QQDTnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@earthlink.com...
*** Follow-up set to comp.theory, sci.math, sci.logic ***
Graham Cooper wrote:
> On Oct 19, 5:08 am, Salmon Egg <Salmon...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> So, after all this Cantor stuff is said, is there a countable set of
>> possible chemical compounds? How would you go about counting them?
>>
>> Remember. This is a chemistry group. I think we deserve to see how
>> Cantor theory can be applied to chemistry, or at least its understanding.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sam
>
>
> a molecule is a finite connected graph with a 100 odd finite alphabet
> of nodes and several connection types.
I don't think he really wanted an answer. I'm interpreting it as a hint
that it is well past time to limit this to newsgroups for which it has
at least a hint of relevance. I've set follow-ups accordingly, and plan
to limit my future replies to the same newsgroups.
Patricia
|
|
