In article <8998fd80-2b73-4d3c-9001-6930b3ed50ae@p18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 25 Okt., 03:34, "|-| E R C" <herc.of.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > All you need is 2 sides with a right angle between them! > > That is a good idea! > > So let's use the following configuration: > > 1 > > 1,2 > 2 > > 1,2,3 > 2 > 3 > ... > > Is there any matheologician who denies that both sequences have limit > omega as a maximum?
Possibly matheologist WM does not deny it, but any reasonably competent mathematician would.
Neither sequence, nor any infinite sequences of strictly increasing terms, ever has a "maximum". Such sequences may have limits but since those limits cannot be members of the sequences, neither can they be maximums of such sequences.
