In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 1 Nov., 20:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So when we add the complete first column we do no have to add a line > > index. > > So whether or not we have a complete first column the set of line > > indexes > > is identical to the set of column indexes. Stop claiming that if the > > first > > column is complete there must be more lines than columns. > > If the first column is complete and if an actually infinite (complete) > string of digits is to carry any mathematical meaning or can be > detected by mathematical means then there must be more lines than > columns.
Since one can still biject the set of lines with the set of columns, WM's "more" is at best ambiguous, and is, otherwise, just another of his matheological messes. --