On Nov 12, 3:21 pm, palsing <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 12, 8:21 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2:34 pm, palsing <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Nov 11, 5:30 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 7, 3:13 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> sputtered: > > > > > > >...Then you don't know that y = x^2 has 'y' becoming infinite > > > > > > while the x is still finite. > > > > > I would bet that an airhead like your thinks it is possible to get out > > > > four pounds of hamburger after grinding up only two pounds of steak. > > > > But nowhere in the UNIVERSE does that happen! In the equation y = x^2, > > > > values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 for 'x' will yield values for 'y' of: 1, 4, 9 and > > > > 25. Unless you are BLIND (and dumb) the values of y, or OUT energy, > > > > are increasing faster than the values of x, or IN energy. Such a > > > > realization is NOT negated by the fact that there is no ACTUAL > > > > infinity, but only the APPROACH of infinity. Your attempt to counter > > > > science truth by arguing the ridiculous, has failed once again. ? > > > > NoEinstein ? > > > > Every time you touch your keyboard you show just how much you don't > > > really understand. > > > > What does y = x^2 have to do with energy? I don't see any units, here, > > > this is just algebra. You clearly stated earlier that "y = x^2 has 'y' > > > becoming infinite while the x is still finite." > > > > I pointed out that you are incorrect, but now you say that y only > > > approaches infinity. You can't have it both ways, one of your > > > statements is wrong. Which is it? > > > > \Paul A > > > Dear Palsing: NO equation has anything to do with anything until the > > variables and the intent are explained. My my saying, rightly, that > > Einstein's SRT violates the Law of the Conservation of Energy-Mass, it > > is assumed that his 'v', for velocity, is the only variable. > > Einstein, the MORON, explained that the E, for ENERGY, of a speck of > > matter will become infinite at velocity 'c'. In actuality, 'v' is > > ANALOGOUS to the momentum force, in pounds, that is associated with > > that velocity. Pounds of FORCE, IN, = E, energy, in pounds of force > > OUT. Understand (Ha!)? y = x^2, is a simple parabola that will reach > > infinity for ANY assigned variable definition. You've contributed > > nothing to science and that continues to be your fate. ? NoEinstein > > ? > > The more you explain, the less I understand what you are preaching, > but the more I understand that you know virtually nothing concerning > math or physics. > > http://tinyurl.com/7p9jpya- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
palsing: It takes two to communicate. Your "lack of understanding" is a failed ploy in support of the now disproved status quo physics. When are you going to list your non-existent contributions to science? Ha, ha, HA! ? NE ?